New Frontiers Demo Build cf4c866 ยท 2026-10-19

Dragonfly Titan GCS

Mode Preflight
MET 00:00
Altitude 0.0 m
Speed 0.0 m/s
Power 5.6 kW
Battery 96%
N 0 / E 0 m Simulated telemetry Systems nominal
3 sites / 1 science story

First expedition

Compare three sites, scout a new landing area and send the evidence home.

Free flight remains available. Progress is saved on the ground.

Science notebook and debrief 0 / 3 sites

Illustrative, compressed-scale dune/interdune terrain inspired by the Ahmakiq Undae landing-area description. Not a surveyed map, flight-qualified planner or real science data.

Optional quick survey
Interdune surveySurvey the edge of a rain-darkened interdune from dry ground.
171 m to outcrop
Titan day 112:00 local / Afternoon (Earth in view)

Time scale: a real Titan day lasts 382.7 hours (about 16 Earth days), with about one flight per day. Sampling offers a 30 s demo or estimated extended profiles. Accelerated operations advance the shared simulation clock; sleeping through the rest of the day and night takes a few seconds.

Vehicle / North up Rotor diameter 1.35 m
Titan landing area
Heading 084 deg
Battery96% / 10 C
Bay air12 C
Flight leftLanded
LinkReady
PlanNone
Weather0.8 m/s / quiet
Throttle / Yaw
UP DN L R
THR 50% / YAW 0%
Attitude
P +0.0 / R +0.0
Rotors
8 / 8 nominal
Pitch / Roll
FWD AFT L R
PIT 0% / ROL 0%
Vehicle Layers

Research model: 2023 thermal layout, refined with APL CAD and NASA's 2026 print guide. Component shapes and placement are approximate; readings are simulated.

NASA / Johns Hopkins APL - artist's concept
NASA / APL references CAD, payload and print files
APL Dragonfly payload cutaway: raised forward instrument bay, central electronics, aft generator, four coaxial rotor pairs and landing skids.

Loading APL payload cutaway...

Payload layout visualization. The source does not state a revision date. Colors identify instruments, not temperatures.

Open full-size cutaway ↗

Credit: Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory. Spacecraft and Science Payload ↗

Hover induced velocity 4.36 m/s
Ideal hover power 5.16 kW
Modeled hover power 5.60 kW
Ideal Earth hover 212 kW
Flight Profile Takeoff, hover, traverse, descent
Engineering references Published test context

APL TITAN Chamber

Test environment
Cryogenic nitrogen
Temperature range
-180 to +150 C
Pressure range
380-700 Torr
Test article
Full-scale thermal mock-up

Earth-gravity thermal testing, not free flight. The chamber pressure range differs from Titan's 146 kPa surface pressure.

APL thermal test report, 2024 (PDF)

Rotor & Thermal Systems

NASA Langley wind-tunnel campaigns test rotor loads and aerodynamics. Sikorsky supports aeromechanics and flight-hardware modeling.

APL rotor testing, January 2026

Lockheed Martin's mission roles include the cruise stage and aeroshell.

Lockheed Martin mission hardware

The real lander's thermal system circulates MMRTG waste heat through insulated equipment bays and rejects excess heat through a cold duct.

Vehicle part references Papers, photos and patents behind the redrawn parts

Saved pages, photos and credits for every part: part sources · interior rebuild checklist.

Vehicle part assumptions What is published and what is estimated, part by part

19 of the 24 interior parts are redrawn from their own sources (4 by Codex, 15 by Claude). Each part's Component text in the Vehicle Layers panel says the same in more detail, with links. This counts initial asset passes, not verified flight replicas; METHAN is a labeled design-based approximation.

  • 01 DrACO drills (Claude). Published: two redundant rotary-percussive drills, one beside each side of the body; a head with percussion and rotation actuators riding a Z-stage rail; a hollow bit reaching 6 cm deep (DrACO, LPSC 2022). Estimated: part sizes, proportioned from the paper's CAD figure (about 0.7 m tall), colors, and the fore-aft position (0.43 m forward of center, inside the sources' 0.34-0.45 m).
  • 02 Sample-transfer lines (Claude). Published: the cross-strapped layout: either drill can feed either cup through flow diverters, and a return line runs to two blowers (DrACO fig. 1). Estimated: tube size (about 13 mm), routes and hose lengths.
  • 03 Nose bulkhead (Codex, provisional). Real 2026 structure photos inform panel finish, perimeter joints and fasteners; the older ICES-2023 thermal CAD provides layout only. The complete nose face is not exposed clearly. Estimated: the retained 0.70 x 0.40 m envelope, 20 mm depth, 3 mm face, flanges, corners, mounts and fastener pattern. Hiding Covers removes a representation, not a verified flight hatch. Hidden core/layup and apertures are not reconstructed; empty space in inspection means unmodeled, not hollow flight hardware. This pass remains unchecked.
  • 04 Nose cameras (Claude). Published: the camera types (Forward MAC with a 12.6 mm lens, Forward WAC and two Side Cameras with 5.8 mm lenses, two NavCams), one shared camera body, and positions from the 2026 DragonCam paper's CAD figures. Estimated: pointing angles, which low unit is the WAC or a NavCam, and which camera carries the black hood.
  • 06 Sample carousel (Codex). Published: the casing, cooling fins and drives below, as photographed in NASA's integration photos; its place in the cold attic (SciTech 2024). Estimated: the 0.36 m drum diameter, fittings and exact placement; the indexing ring is a diagram cue, not flight hardware.
  • 07 Wonderwall (Codex). Published: a barrier between the cold carousel and warm DraMS, with the instruments about 5 cm apart (ICES-2023). Estimated: the contour, thickness, layers and openings (the 5 cm is a separation, not the wall thickness).
  • 08 DraMS (Codex). Published: laser desorption and gas chromatography / mass spectrometry modes; its place in the warm attic (SciTech 2024). Estimated: enclosure sizes, covers, routes and fan; electrodes, GC columns, laser optics and the oven are not drawn.
  • 10 Antenna gimbal (Claude). Published: a motorized arm that raises the 87.4 cm dish when landed and lowers it into a locking mechanism before flight (APL); azimuth and elevation actuators under tan foam forward of the stowed dish, a launch lock under the dish with a flight lock either side (ICES-2023); the gimbal's internal portion under the deck, a 5 cm foam dome above it and a thermally isolated joint to the dish (ICES-2020); the look of the gold actuator drum, arm and truss pedestal from APL's photo. Estimated: sizes, the 0.6 m arm and hinge position (measured on ICES-2023 fig. 1 against the dish), lock shapes and colors, and the azimuth limit that keeps the dish out of the attic (so with Earth behind the lander the dish cannot point straight at it).
  • 11 Power switching units (Claude). Published: two units; the face of PSU 1, mapped connector by connector from NASA/APL's testing photo, beside the IEM as photographed. Estimated: size (about 20 x 24 x 19 cm, scaled from standard D-sub connectors); where PSU 2 sits, and its face (drawn like PSU 1).
  • 12 Integrated electronics module (Claude). Published: its look in NASA/APL's integration photos: heat-sink top, bolted connector face, Micro-D connectors, copper ground strap, mounted on a wall panel beside a PSU. Estimated: size (about 28 x 28 x 22 cm, scaled from standard Micro-D connectors), the hidden window layout, depth and which wall.
  • 13 Frontier radio (Claude). Published: APL's photo of a four-slice stack with labeled connectors; 4 x 6 inch slices; 2.1 kg. Estimated: stack width, slice split and connector details read from the photo; its place on the starboard bay floor; whether a second unit flies.
  • 14 Radio amplifier (TWTA) (Claude). Published: one 100 W X-band amplifier on the underside of the top deck, warm in flight (NASA; ICES-2020 and 2023). Estimated: its look and sizes, since Dragonfly's unit is not pictured: drawn like LRO's, MRO's and Stellant's flight amplifiers (a 33 cm tube and a 21 cm power conditioner); its place above the radio; the waveguide route forward to the antenna gimbal, the coax and the harness.
  • 15 Battery (Claude). Published: an 11.5 kWh pack of 24 GS Yuasa cells, 134 Ah, built by APL; fans, heat pipes in three directions, fins between the cell stacks and 7.5 kg of phase-change wax (Aerospace America 2022; APL; ICES-2020, 2022, 2023); real photos of APL's 9-cell thermal test module (ICES-2022). Estimated: the cell model (GS Yuasa's 134 Ah LSE134, inferred), the 4 x 6 layout, the enclosure (its look taken from the test module, which is not flight hardware), fan and connector positions, the place just forward of the aft arms (TFAWS 2023 plan view); the wax is not drawn because where it sits is not published.
  • 16 Aft bulkhead (Claude). Published: NASA/APL structure photos show the gold-colored aft face, pocketed rim and ribbed circular generator interface; the July article explicitly identifies the vibration fixture as inverted. Estimated: 25-degree aft/up generator tilt, panel dimensions, thickness, coating, pocket/fastener layout, foam profile, antenna and fan placement. APL's 2024 CAD cross-checks orientation only. The photographed cylinder is test hardware; the collar fits the modeled panel but its actual air passage and final flight configuration are not reconstructed. Codex completed verification and release documentation.
  • 17 Circulation fans (Claude). Published: two fans (A and B) at the MMRTG end, 0.052 kg/s by design within a 15 W allocation; a flight-like fan tested at 5,000-6,200 rpm (TFAWS 2023 and 2024, ICES-2023). Estimated: fan size, scaled from the 2023 plan view, housings, revised fore-aft placement and the collar at the canted aft panel.
  • 18 Warm duct (Claude). Published: a duct on the centerline under the floor from the fans to the nose, turning up into the body below the nose; about 14 cm wide, measured on the 2023 plan view (TFAWS 2023). Estimated: its height and flanges.
  • 19 Trim device (Claude). Published: a cold bypass duct under the belly, outside the foam, between fore and aft diverter flaps that send 0-40% of the warm flow through it; a full-scale test reached 245.7 W at a 23.7-degree flap angle (TFAWS 2023 and 2024). Estimated: the duct section, housings and actuators; ICES-2023's earlier side-chimney concept is archived.
  • 22 EFIELD / METHAN (Codex). Published: two fixed EFIELD probes with 30 cm carbon-fiber stalks and 5 cm gold-plated aluminum balls, front upper starboard / rear lower port locations, co-mounted atmospheric TEMP/MICRO; METHAN's cold dust-filtered mirrored cell connected by optical fibers to a warm DPU light engine, using 1.67 micrometer and continuum sources (IPM 2025). Estimated: EFIELD preamp size, exact mounting/pointing and interfaces; all METHAN casing dimensions, material/finish, two filter cassettes, supports, cover and fiber-entry geometry. METHAN is an approved design approximation, not photo-matched hardware. Hidden optics and warm DPU internals are not drawn.
  • 23 Lower DragonCam cameras (Claude). Published: the Microscopic Camera (105 x 155 x 90 mm, 1.04 kg) viewing the drill site from 986 mm at 52 degrees; APL's LED array with 365 nm UV; a Down Camera on each side; 3 mm windows in foam cavities (DragonCam paper). Estimated: the Down Cameras' exact positions, brackets and harness; the extra foam the Microscopic Camera needs is not drawn.
  • 24 DrACO blowers (Claude). Published: two redundant centrifugal blowers behind the port forward arm, exposed to Titan, fed through an inlet flow diverter (DrACO; ICES-2023). Estimated: their sizes and shapes.
  • Reference rebuilds still open: 03 nose bulkhead, 05 navigation and lidar electronics, 09 rotor drive electronics, 20-21 temperature sensors. The rotor-drive enclosures remain provisional illustrations, not photo-matched hardware.
Model assumptions

Sourced design, approximate geometry

Published reference values include the 875 kg mass, 1.35 m rotor diameter and four coaxial rotor stations. Storage uses the reported 11.5 kWh design; the 15% reserve is a demo choice. The three-blade configuration follows the 2026 engineer interview. Sources span design revisions, not a certified final flight configuration.

The NASA / APL model is built from procedural geometry using public thermal figures, CAD imagery and assembly references. It is not imported flight CAD. Interior parts are being redrawn one at a time from their own sources: the sample carousel, Wonderwall, DraMS and EFIELD / METHAN assemblies (Codex) and the Frontier radio, integrated electronics module, power switching units, lower DragonCam cameras, nose cameras, DrACO drills, sample-transfer lines and blowers, circulation fans, warm duct, trim device, radio amplifier, antenna gimbal, battery and aft bulkhead (Claude) follow public photos, papers, design diagrams and published sizes; where no size is published, standard parts such as connectors can be used for scale. Component dimensions, placement and tube routing remain approximations, and the drill's part sizes are proportioned from a CAD figure: positions are mostly estimated, though the Microscopic Camera's comes from its published 986 mm, 52-degree view of the drill site. The sample carousel now shows its enclosed drum rather than the earlier 24 drawn cups. No photograph of Dragonfly's radio amplifier was found in the reviewed sources, so it is drawn like published flight amplifiers of its kind, with sizes scaled from them. The aft panel's appearance follows real structure photos; its 25-degree generator tilt and detailed dimensions are estimates. METHAN is a design-based approximation, not a hardware-photo match. Parts not yet redrawn (nose bulkhead and electronics, drive electronics and battery/MMRTG temperature sensors) remain simplified estimates or provisional enclosures. Each part's Component text says what is published and what is estimated, and Vehicle part assumptions lists it part by part (19 of 24 redrawn so far). The original demo model and its interior are deliberately labeled mock-ups.

Rotor-drive electronics provisional pass (Codex): two boxes with internal fans are documented in ICES-2023, but the housing details, fan count, vents, connector blanks and placement shown here are illustrative estimates. No hidden circuit boards are reconstructed. This does not count as a completed reference-based asset. The real RDE thermal-test photograph in APL's CAPS 2024 presentation, slide 27 is too obscured to establish flight casing detail. Real hardware photographs take priority over CGI for future appearance updates.

Inspection layers expose the geometry currently modeled. Body and attic shells still combine their outer shape and insulation; the foam control removes separately modeled insulation around equipment and interfaces. Compartment panels include the bulkheads and Wonderwall faces. Removing a casing reveals only modeled geometry, not a reconstruction of undisclosed electronics. A complete skin, deck and insulation construction stack remains a research task.

DraGMet external instruments (Codex): EFIELD follows real engineering-model photos and published probe dimensions. METHAN's gas-cell casing is an approved design approximation from the published arrangement, with estimated filtered covers, brackets and fiber entry. Its warm sources/detectors belong inside the vehicle and are not reconstructed outside. No undisclosed mirrors, flight optical path, internal electronics or final flight configuration is claimed. Finishing the initial asset pass does not close the hardware-photo and exact-dimension follow-ups.

Illustrative environment

Dunes and interdunes are inspired by the published Ahmakiq Undae landing-area description. Exact terrain, sparse sharp mountain landmarks, rocks, candidate sites and the outcrop are invented training geography, not a surveyed landing map. The small methane puddle is an invented training hazard, not a claim that a lake lies at the landing site; rain-darkened ground is also illustrative.

Sky color, haze, lighting, ground texture and rotor-wash particles are visual approximations. Weather events are seeded and compressed for training, not a Titan forecast or a full atmospheric model. The clean room is a parked illustrative display; the Saturn poster is a photographic composite, not to scale or a view from the lander.

Simplified engineering

Throttle commands a climb rate rather than motor torque. Attitude, rotor mixing, drag, loss factors, guidance, collision protection and touchdown flare are simplified, not a flight-qualified six-degree-of-freedom model. Thermal readouts mix documented reference values with estimated heat balances and shared zone temperatures; they are not hardware sensor measurements. The liquid-to-liquid exchanger study is a hypothetical exercise, not confirmed Titan-surface equipment.

Deliberate simulation additions

  • Reverse (sim) is fictional and off by default. At zero manual throttle above 1 m, it adds up to 0.2 m/s2 downward acceleration until reaching 0.6 m/s descent, with an estimated 50 W extra load and reversed rotor animation. It is disabled over liquid and in automated flight. These are gameplay settings, not Dragonfly capabilities.
  • The 30-second, 160 W sampling demo and longer LDMS/GCMS training profiles use estimated stage durations, loads, heat coupling and data volumes, not flight procedures. Drill/transfer/carousel motion, flow markers and example chemical results are illustrative. No real drill-force, cup capacity, spectra, retention times or detailed oven temperatures are simulated.
  • Transparent cutaways, thermal colors, isolated parts and the sampling-follow camera are inspection aids, not onboard camera imagery. Pausing freezes the simulation, not just the display.
  • Accelerated rest, time warp, shortened objectives and liquid no-landing protection are training conveniences. Communications and energy costs are modeled estimates, not a prediction of mission performance.

NASA spacecraft and instruments · APL model references · Project research and assumptions

Autonomous flight / simulated

Flight Plan

Tap the map to add up to 6 waypoints; tap a site to use it. Dragonfly lands at the last waypoint, which must be a scouted site. Flying within 60 m of an unscouted site at 20 m or higher scouts it for a later flight.

Illustrative relief: lighter = higher dunes or hills. Green = scouted; amber = scout first. Dark blue = liquid, no landing.

Route distance
0 m
Flight time / estimate
0:00
Energy / incl. preheat
0 Wh
Battery at landing
--
Battery temperature at landing
--
Will scout
none

NO-GO

    Dragonfly is never flown live: signals take 73-90 minutes each way, so flights are planned on Earth, uplinked and flown autonomously. The uplink here takes a few seconds. Estimates use the simulator's power curve and the documented +10 C per 30 min battery heating.

    Vehicle engineering / simulated

    Energy & Thermal Diagnostics

    Systems nominal

    Thermal loop

    Equipment bay
    12.0 C
    Battery
    10.0 C
    Battery wax buffer (7.5 kg, melts at 22.5 C)
    0% melted
    Ambient
    -179.2 C
    Surface gas
    Nitrogen-rich
    Surface reference
    146 kPa / 5.44 kg/m3
    External convection / modeled
    -- W/m2/K
    Open-duct conductance / modeled
    -- W/K
    Foam + external film
    -- W/K
    Circulating gas
    0.052 kg/s
    Warm duct gas / modeled
    -- C
    MMRTG thermal source
    1800 W
    Generator external loss / modeled
    -- W
    Heat into bay
    0 W
    Heat rejected from bay
    0 W
    Circulation integrity
    100%
    Insulation integrity
    100%
    Auto / 600 s control interval

    Titan-inspired weather / training

    Quiet / occasional gusts and rarer methane-rain scenarios

    Automatic events stay at or below 1.6 m/s. Their frequency, compressed durations and warning lead times are assumptions, not Titan forecasts. Wind affects cooling; ambient stays at -179.2 C.

    Optional stress scenario: 2 simulated minutes of warning, then winds up to 4.5 m/s, reduced visibility and extra wetting of the existing rain-darkened patch. New flight plans are held until recovery. Select Fixed wind to end an event.

    Rain-darkened patch
    0% additional wetting / illustrative
    Recent advisories / simulation time
    No events yet

    Energy & Surface Operations

    MMRTG electric / estimated
    90 W
    Vehicle load
    0 W
    Net battery power
    0 W
    Stored energy / 2022 baseline
    11.04 kWh
    Time to 15% reserve
    --
    Flight time left / estimate
    Landed
    Flight elapsed / 30 min plan
    0:00
    Motor preheat / 8 x 90 W x 5 min
    Cold / 60 Wh at next takeoff
    Local solar time / approximate
    12:00 / Day
    Surface elapsed
    0.0 h
    Hibernation available after dry-ground landing.

    Sample return

    Objective
    Not started
    Acquisition
    0 / 30 s
    Samples secured
    0

    Descent advisory / approximate

    Downspeed ratio
    0.00 x hover inflow
    Descent path angle
    0 deg
    Vortex-ring-state proxy
    No proxy trigger

    Documented Dragonfly Architecture

    Cassini observed methane clouds developing and fading over an 11-hour northern observation, equatorial surface wetting after a methane storm, and features interpreted as organic dust storms over dunes. Those observations do not establish local storm frequencies or warning lead times for Dragonfly. This simulator compresses events into minutes for training; it does not model atmospheric fronts, forecast actual weather, blow rocks into the air or grow the methane puddle. Cloud evolution / Equatorial rain / Dust-storm evidence

    On Titan, fans distribute MMRTG waste heat and a cold-duct bypass controls cooling. In space, the cruise system uses a pumped fluid loop and radiators. Surface convection is not the same as vacuum heat rejection. NASA/APL thermal controller design (2023)

    The surface loop circulates nitrogen-rich atmospheric gas, not liquid nitrogen. Cold gas, flow resistance and external wind affect heat transport. NASA's 2026 workshop abstract continues to describe fan-driven circulation, cold-duct trim and insulation, with coupled thermal and CFD analysis. 2026 Dragonfly thermal modeling abstract

    The battery supports high flight loads while the MMRTG produces electricity day and night. A roughly 16-Earth-day rotation gives approximately eight days per half-cycle near the equator; actual illumination varies. NASA power system / Titan environment

    The 2024 rotor study found strongest thrust fluctuations in steep descent, beyond 60 degrees and roughly 0.75-1.25 times hover induced speed. The advisory uses ground-relative descent as a proxy, not measured shaft-relative inflow, and does not simulate thrust loss. No trigger does not establish safe flight. Marshall et al., 2024

    Exchanger references & evidence
    Hypothetical liquid-to-liquid shell study

    Independent of vehicle telemetry. Assumed single-phase fluids, no environmental heat loss, no pump power or freezing model. Effectiveness is an input, not a shell-geometry prediction or flight specification.

    Q = effectiveness x smaller heat-capacity rate x inlet temperature difference. Both outlet temperatures conserve that same heat flow. Coolant choice and phase limits need separate qualification. Heat-exchanger energy balance reference

    Shell-and-tube exchangers separate two flowing fluids with tube walls; baffles guide shell-side flow. Fixed, floating-head and U-tube designs manage construction and expansion differently. These are general industrial principles, not confirmation of Dragonfly hardware or a flight efficiency rating. TubeTech source article

    Fixed tube sheet
    Tube sheets welded to shell
    Floating head
    Movable rear header; removable bundle
    U-tube
    Free bend accommodates expansion
    Multiple passes / baffles
    Alter flow and heat transfer

    A liquid-to-liquid shell is a reasonable conceptual option for separate coolant circuits. Its geometry alone does not specify coolant, pressure, freezing margin or performance. Nitrogen outside does not require nitrogen inside a sealed liquid circuit. Any such variant here would be an assumed design study, separate from the documented surface gas loop.

    Complex coupled liquid loops do have spacecraft precedent: NASA describes interacting rover and cruise loops for Mars Science Laboratory. That supports the general concept, not a claim that Dragonfly uses the same hardware or fluids. NASA MMRTG heat-exchanger study

    Cutaway of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger showing the tube bundle, baffles and separate fluid paths
    Shell-and-tube heat exchanger cutaway: tube bundle, baffles and separate shell- and tube-side flow paths. Representative industrial design.
    TubeTech diagram of a tube bundle and shell-side flow
    Tube bundle and shell-side flow arrangement. Source: TubeTech.

    Lockheed Martin supplies Dragonfly's cruise stage and aeroshell and supports integration. Public NASA and APL sources do not yet describe a liquid-to-liquid exchanger on Dragonfly, so the figures above illustrate the concept explored in this study rather than flight hardware. Lockheed Martin / NASA integration update

    Calm-weather overheating is a documented design concern and is modeled here. Component melting and landing skids sinking into ice do not appear in the published thermal analyses, so they are left out of the model for now. NASA interview

    Simulation limits & assumed parameters

    The 2020/2023 thermal designs specify a 0-20 C landed battery band and a 35 C upper operating limit. Charging is inhibited below 0 C or at 35 C. Equipment-bay -20 to 55 C and 15% reserve are demo guards. Thermal nodes (60/30 kJ/K), battery losses, 8 W/K coupling and controller gains are assumptions. PCM buffering, detailed motor preheat and individual electronics temperatures are not resolved. APL lander thermal model, 2023

    Convection interpolates between 4 W/m2/K calm, 10.5 at 1.6 m/s and 75 at 10 m/s. These are source-informed bounds, not a CFD correlation. Foam thickness 0.0762 m, cold conductivity 0.01 W/m/K and gas flow 0.052 kg/s come from the preliminary design; 20 m2 area and constant 1050 J/kg/K gas heat capacity are assumptions. Source-gas heat is balanced between bay circulation and an assumed external loss path. The cold duct closes in flight; landed commands use 0-40% airflow in 2% steps and a 600 s PI update. This is a simplified single controller, not the flight MIMO system.

    Storage uses the 11.5 kWh pack reported in 2022; accessible capacity and reserve remain simplified. Estimated arrival generation is 90 W (or 70 W), declining 2.5% per Earth year; this is not a mission guarantee. Thermal output starts at 1,800 W and follows Pu-238 decay. 2022 design report / NASA MMRTG fact sheet

    The flight-power estimate combines decreasing induced power with profile, drag and climb terms. Its drag area (0.65 m2), profile speed (55 m/s), efficiencies and wind correction are assumptions, not a measured flight curve. Three blades per rotor follow the lead rotor engineer's account; the ambiguous transcript RPM figure is not used. APL engineer interview, June 2026

    GS Yuasa identifies supplied LSE134 cells as 134 Ah at 3.75 V nominal. Cell specifications alone do not establish the full pack topology or usable flight energy. Battery manufacturer

    Hibernation compresses time only on dry ground. It pauses on thermal warnings. The mission's 30-second acquisition, methane puddle, landing protection and automatic guidance are gameplay abstractions, not real mission operations.